{"id":9927,"date":"2019-08-16T02:48:07","date_gmt":"2019-08-15T19:48:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arkipel.org\/?p=9927"},"modified":"2019-08-16T02:48:07","modified_gmt":"2019-08-15T19:48:07","slug":"bromocorah-its-position-in-social-political-and-cultural-context","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arkipel.org\/bromocorah-its-position-in-social-political-and-cultural-context\/","title":{"rendered":"Bromocorah: Its Position in Social, Political, and Cultural Context"},"content":{"rendered":"[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898459153{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]\n
Moderator: Prashasti Wilujeng Putri Fokus pada lingkup Asia dan Amerika Latin, dua kawasan yang dianggap dapat menawarkan warna berbeda dari wacana dominan Modernisme Barat, panel ini diharapkan bisa menyajikan sebuah pendedahan visioner untuk melihat kekinian bromocorah. Bagaimanakah kita seharusnya menerjemahkan posisi bromocorah sekarang ini, ketika kita menyadari bahwa, bahkan sebagai residu dari sistem pun, eksistensinya tak lekang oleh waktu; dan dengan segala sifat khasnya yang juga kerap membuatnya berada “di antara”, ia terus mempertentangkan ruang dan waktu zamannya, juga menggugah identitasnya sendiri dan medan-medan sosial tempatnya melestarikan kedinamisan masyarakat. Penelaahan lewat tinjauan atas produk-produk kultural semacam sinema, sastra, dan seni rupa, agaknya merupakan salah satu cara yang bernas untuk menajamkan bingkaian kita dalam proses penerjemahan itu.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565897273424{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]\n The interpretation of \u201cbromocorah\u201d<\/em> as a concept shifts through time and space. What remains is the position of bromocorah<\/em> that is always outside the dominant system. Therefore, they are always\u00a0\u201cthe others.\u201d\u00a0In its most definitive meaning, bromocorah<\/em> is given a label for the government to categorize them as if to include them within the system, especially within the material and formal legal system. But the presumption of bromocorah<\/em> included in the system does not cause their existence in the society not being the other. Instead, it emphasizes the position of bromocorah<\/em> as a non-organic part of the system. This indicates that the categorization of bromocorah<\/em> is nothing but an effort to monitor and control them. We need to criticize the relation of \u201cbromocorah\u201d <\/em>and \u201csystem\u201d in the context of today, considering the structural shifts of contemporary society, from the newest way of society to connect with each other, new perceptions of social norms and law, global economic conditions that changes the internal state of a nation or the form of socio-political relations between nations in the world, to the problems of language that determines the creation of new categorical modes of various actual phenomena loaded with hyperreality characteristics.<\/span><\/p>\n Focusing on Asia and Latin America, two regions considered able to offer different perspectives from the dominant Western Modernism discourse; this panel is expected to provide a visionary exposure to see the contemporary bromocorah<\/em>. How we should translate the position of bromocorah<\/em> in recent times, when we realize that even as a residue of the system, its existence is timeless; with all its distinctive qualities which also make them “in-between”, it continues to contrapose the time and space of its era, and arouses its own identity and its social fields where it preserves the dynamism of society. Study through the review of cultural products such as cinema, literature, and art perhaps are one of the profound ways to sharpen our framing on the translation process.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_text_separator title=”About the Panelist” color=”black” border_width=”2″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”9929″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898113542{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Ronny Agustinus<\/strong><\/em> merupakan salah satu pendiri Ruangrupa. Sejak 2005 hingga sekarang diterbitkan penerbit Marjin Kiri. Ia juga merupakan sesi kurator Amerika Latin untuk ARKIPEL; Jakarta International Documentary & Experimental Film Festival 2014-2016, juri ARKIPEL 2014-2015, juri dokumenter panjang Festival Film Dokumenter 2015 dan 2017 (Yogyakarta), dan juri Festival Film Psikologi 2016 (Surabaya).[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898129231{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Ronny Agustinus <\/strong><\/em>is one of the founders of ruangrupa. He has been developing his independent publisher, Marjin Kiri, since 2005. He curated the Latin America session in ARKIPEL; Jakarta International Documentary & Experimental Film Festival 2014-2016. He was Jury at ARKIPEL 2014-2015, at the feature documentary of Festival Film Dokumenter (FFD) 2015 and 2017 (Yogyakarta), and at Psychology Film Festival 2016 (Surabaya).<\/span>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”9930″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898178526{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Manneke Budiman <\/strong><\/em>(1965) dosen di Fakultas Ilmu Budaya UI, pernah belajar di University of Winconsin, Madison, Amerika Serikat. Mendapat gelar Ph.D dari Universitas British Colombio, Kanada. Ia terlatih dengan Inggris literatur, dan Studi Asia- spesialis isu sosial dan kultural di kawasan ASEAN. Memiliki ketertarikan penelitian dengan skala yang luas, termasuk studi perempuan, studi translasi, kritik post-kolonial, dan studi kultural. Penelitian terbaru yaitu kultur pemuda dan media sosial di Indonesia.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898195487{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Manneke Budiman<\/strong><\/em> is a lecturer at the Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia. He studied at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States. He received a PhD from the University of British Colombia, Canada. He is an expert in English literature, and Asian Studies – a specialist in social and cultural issues in the ASEAN region. His broad research interests including women studies, translational studies, post-colonial criticism, and cultural studies. The latest research is youth culture and social media in Indonesia.<\/span>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”9931″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898265873{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Philippa Lovatt<\/strong><\/em> adalah seorang Dosen Studi Film di Universitas St Andrews, ia mengajar Film & Video Artis dan Bioskop Asia. Dia adalah anggota dari Association of Southeast Asian Cinemas<\/em> (ASEAC) antara tahun 2016 dan 2018, dia adalah Penyelidik Utama dari jaringan penelitian yang didanai AHRC, ‘Southeast Asian Cinemas Research Network: Promoting Dialogue Across Critical and Creative Practice<\/em>\u2019, yang diadakan di Kuala Lumpur, Los Angeles, Hanoi dan Glasgow. Dia saat ini sedang mengerjakan dua proyek penelitian baru, pertama \u2018Memory, Process, and Practice: Oral Histories of Southeast Asian Film Organizing<\/em>\u2019\u00a0 (bersama Jasmine Trice) dan kedua, \u2018Southeast Asian Artists\u2019 Moving Image and the Anthropocene<\/em>\u2019. Dia juga menyelesaikan monograf\u00a0 the politics of sound<\/em> dan didengarkan di Global Cinema yang mana akan diterbitkan oleh Edinburgh University Press pada tahun 2020.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898279106{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Philippa Lovatt<\/strong><\/em> is a Lecturer in Film Studies at the University of St Andrews where she teaches Artists’ Film & Video and Asian Cinemas. She is a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Cinemas (ASEAC) and between 2016 and 2018, she was the Primary Investigator of the AHRC funded research network, ‘Southeast Asian Cinemas Research Network: Promoting Dialogue Across Critical and Creative Practice’, which held events in Kuala Lumpur, Los Angeles, Hanoi and Glasgow. She is currently working on two new research projects, firstly ‘Memory, Process, and Practice: Oral History of Southeast Asian Film Organizing’ (with Jasmine Trice) and secondly, ‘Southeast Asian Artists’ ‘Moving Image and the Anthropocene’. She is also completing a monograph about the politics of sound and listening in Global Cinema which will be published by Edinburgh University Press in 2020.<\/span>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_text_separator title=”About the Moderator” color=”black” border_width=”2″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”9928″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898022877{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Prashasti Wilujeng Putri<\/strong><\/em> (Jakarta, 5 Desember 1991), seorang seniman performans dan manajer seni. Menamatkan pendidikan di bidang Kriminologi di Universitas Indonesia tahun 2014. Ia juga merupakan penari dari Anjungan Jawa Tengah Taman Mini Indonesia Indah dan Komunitas Tari Radha Sarisha. Aktif di 69 Performance Club dan Milisifilem Collective.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”5\/12″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565898036755{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Prashasti Wilujeng Putri<\/strong><\/em> ( Jakarta, 5 December 1991) is a performance artist and art manager. She graduated in Criminology at the University of Indonesia in 2014. Dancer of Radha Sarisha dance community and Central Java Pavilion Taman Mini Indonesia Indah.\u00a0 She is active in 69 Performance Club and Milisifilem Collective.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The interpretation of \u201cbromocorah\u201d as a concept shifts through time and space. What remains is the position of bromocorah that is always outside the dominant system. Therefore, they are always \u201cthe others.\u201d <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9474,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[532,307],"tags":[526,528,300],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\n<\/strong>Panelists: Ronny Agustinus, Manneke Budiman, Philippa Lovatt
\n<\/strong><\/p>\nMonday, August 19, 2019 | 09:45 | GoetheHaus<\/h5>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_text_separator title=”Abstrak \/ Abstract” color=”black” border_width=”3″][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565897236489{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Pemaknaan akan konsep \u201cbromocorah\u201d bergeser dari masa ke masa, dari suatu tempat ke tempat lain. Yang selalu sama hanyalah bahwa konsep bromocorah selalu mempunyai posisi di luar sistem dominan. Oleh karena itu, ia selalu menjadi \u201corang lain\u201d. Dalam pemaknaannya yang paling definitif, bromocorah diberikan suatu cap untuk kemudian negara dapat melakukan kategorisasi atasnya seolah-olah sebagai upaya untuk memasukkan bromocorah ke dalam sistem, terutama dalam kerangka hukum material dan formal. Akan tetapi anggapan masuknya bromocorah ke dalam suatu sistem tidak membuat keberadaannya dalam masyarakat menjadi bukan \u201corang lain\u201d, melainkan justru menegaskan posisi bromocorah sebagai hal yang bukan bagian organik dari sistem. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa kategorisasi terhadap bromocorah tidak lain adalah upaya untuk mengawasi dan menguasainya. Kita perlu mengkritisi kembali bentuk relasi antara “bromocorah” dan “sistem” dalam konteks kehidupan saat ini, mengingat adanya pergeseran-pergeseran struktural kehidupan masyarakat kontemporer, mulai dari cara mutakhir masyarakat untuk saling terhubung satu sama lain, persepsi baru di ranah norma sosial dan hukum, kondisi ekonomi global yang mengubah keadaan internal sebuah negara atau bentuk hubungan sosio-politik antar-negara di dunia, hingga persoalan bahasa yang menentukan penciptaan modus-modus kategoritatif baru atas beragam fenomena aktual yang sarat dengan karakteristik hiperealitas.<\/p>\n